A writ petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition citing amicable resolution. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition and stay application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16761/2012
Madanlal
----Petitioner
Versus
Appellate Retn Tribunal Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Malwal for Mr. Sudarshan Laddha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Yaduvanshi for Ms. Alankrita Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
07/08/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has already been resolved between the parties amicably.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil writ petition.
Permission is sought to the petitioner.
Accordingly, this civil writ petition as well as stay application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /168
Madanlal
Appellate Retn Tribunal Ors
Anil Kumar Upan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
