This order dismisses a writ petition held infructuous because the underlying suit had already been decided. Stay petitions and pending applications are also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:16949]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1611/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Ajmera For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
19/04/2024
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous on the ground that the suit itself has been decided.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to refute the same.
(2 of 2) [CW-1611/2017]
[2024:RJ-JD:16949]
In view of the submissions made above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay petition and all pending applications, if any, stand dismissed.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
143-amit/-
Satyanarayan S/o Heeralal Mahajan
Ramnarayan S/o Heeralal Mahajan
Badrinarayan S/o Heeralal Mahajan
Shiv Prasad S/o Ramjas Mahajan
Ramswaroop S/o Jagannath Mahajan
Suraj Devi W/o Late Banshilal Mahajan
Nupur Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
