Petitioners on joint consent sought disposal in terms of a coordinate bench's judgment in Vijay Singh, finding the controversy no longer res integra. The Court accepted the consensus and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:17779]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1423/2020
----Petitioners
(2 of 2) [CW-1423/2020]
[2024:RJ-JD:17779]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarwan Kumar, AGC.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
23/04/2024
(ARUN MONGA),J
56-Rmathur/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶27
Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21/2020
Akhtar Khan Pathan & Ors.
The State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
