The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been decided while the petition was pending. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to raise the grounds in a separate appeal.
Liberty granted to raise grounds in appeal; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:37189]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13982/2024
Gulam Shah S/o Allahbaksh, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Dibba Pada, Airforce Road, Jaisalmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhirendra Pandey for Mr. Vijay Vyas For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
09/09/2024
(DINESH MEHTA),J
284-raksha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the decision of the suit during its pendency?
Gulam Shah
Mehboob
Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Jaisalmer
Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Jaisalmer
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
