Dismissed
Ramchandra v. Mangaram
Rajasthan HCCW/13907/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after parties entered into a compromise during its pendency; connected stay petition also dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:31907]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13907/2022
¶4
Ramchandra S/o Shri Pragdas, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
¶5
----Petitioner
¶6
Versus
¶7
- Mangaram S/o Lumbaram, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
¶8
- Gajaram S/o Lumbaram, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
¶9
- Dargaram S/o Gangda Ram, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
¶10
- Veera Ram S/o Gangda Ram, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
¶11
- Poora Ram S/o Gangda Ram, Resident Of Bhedana, Tehsil Gudamalani, District Barmer (Raj.).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ramchandra
- respondent
Mangaram
- respondent
Gajaram
- respondent
Dargaram
- respondent
Veera Ram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/13907/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court