The connected civil writ petitions were dismissed as the counsel for the petitioner did not wish to press the case, resulting in withdrawal and disposal of the stay application.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:20550-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 342/2011
Rakesh Kumar And Ors
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India Andors
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1387/2011
Hansraj Kharia And Ors
----Petitioner
Versus
U O I And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.S. Sinha on behalf of Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG Mr. R.A. Katta Mr. Neeraj Batra Mr. Tek Chand Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
01/05/2024
Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present
Civil Writ Petition.
The same is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Stay application stands disposed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
MAHIMA/5-6
Rakesh Kumar And Ors
Union Of India And Ors
Hansraj Kharia And Ors
U O I And Ors
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
