Disposed

Dinesh Kumar Damor v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Aug 2024CW/13674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition where petitioners sought withdrawal with liberty to file a representation. The court directed the petitioners to file a representation within two weeks, mandating the authority to decide it within one month without constraining the decision direction. The stay application was also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with liberty to file representation within two weeks; representation to be decided within one month. Stay application disposed.

Dinesh Kumar Damor Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:33973]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13674/2024

¶4

Dinesh Kumar Damor S/o Shri Keshav Lal Damor, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Charwara, Panchayat Samiti Jhothari, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶5

Dinesh Chandra Bhagora S/o Shri Badami Lal Bhagora, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Sanchia, Panchayat Samiti Bichhiwada, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶6

Mukesh Kumar Damor S/o Keshav Lal Damor, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Charwara, P.s. Jhothari, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶7

Devaram Ahari S/o Lembaji Ahari, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Mordungra, Charwara, P.s. Jhothari, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶8

Sandeep Kumar Ahari S/o Keval Ram Ahari, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Panchayat Samiti Jhothari, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶9

Sanjay Katara S/o Hurma Katara, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Panchayat Samiti Simalwara, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶10

Prakash Nanoma S/o Bharat Nanoma, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Panchayat Samiti Simalwara, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶11

Harish Chandra Roat S/o Jayanti Lal Roat, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Panchayat Samiti Jhothari, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶12

----Petitioners

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Tribal Regional Development Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶15

The Director, Swachh Pariyojana, Saheli Marg, Chetak Circle, Udaipur.

¶16

The Project Officer, Swachh Pariyojana, Sabela Bypass Road, Behind Golden Wing, Nawadera, Dungarpur.

¶17

The Director, Bimalraj Outsorcing Private Limited, Gurugram, Haryana.

----Respondents

[2024:RJ-JD:33973]

[CW-13674/2024]

(2 of 2)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kanojiya

¶23

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶24

Order

¶25

16/08/2024

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to pursue their cause by way of filing a representation.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation along with certified copy of the order instant within a period of two weeks.

¶28

In case, a representation is so addressed, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation.

¶29

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶30

The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.

¶31

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶32

298-akansha/-

Dinesh Kumar Damor v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar Damor v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Uttam Prakash Soni Vs State and Anr.

Abid Hussain Vs State and Anr.

Rishabh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Udaipur Development Authority Vs Mangilal