Single-judge order dismissing a writ petition seeking a directed inquiry into pattas and disclosure of documents, holding that appropriate remedies exist under the Right to Information Act and other legal provisions.
The writ petition was dismissed; stay petition and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:36161]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13668/2024
Nema Ram S/o Devaram, Aged About 50 Years, Panchwa Khurd, Tehsil Sojat, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Purohit
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
02/09/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:36161]
[CW-13668/2024]
concerned, if the petitioner wishes to get the same cancelled, an appropriate remedy is also available.
(REKHA BORANA),J
3-AbhishekK/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the respondent authorities regarding an inquiry into pattas and issuance of documents under a writ petition.
Nema Ram S/o Devaram
The State Of Rajasthan
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
