Petitioners sought consideration of their representation regarding a grievance against education/panchayati raj authorities. The court disposed of the petition directing them to file a fresh representation and respondent no.3 to consider it in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:8217]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1340/2024
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheru Lal Jat
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
16/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:8217]
[CW-1340/2024]
(2 of 2)
(DINESH MEHTA), J.
C.No.18(39)-Mak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the District Education Officer should be directed to consider the petitioners' representation expeditiously.
Sagar Paliwal
Ranu Paliwal
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department
The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mavli, Udaipur
The District Education Officer Elementary And Panchayati Raj (Elementary), Udaipur
The Office Panchayat Primary Education Officer, Gram Panchayat, Sakroda
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
