Borrower challenged SARFAESI notices issued by the bank under Sections 13(2) and 13(4). The respondents stated the notices were being withdrawn with liberty to proceed afresh under the Act of 2002, and the court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50060]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13257/2018
M/s. Richa and Company, through Proprietor Rajeev Sharma S/o Sawarmal Sharma, Address -168, Flat No.5D, Khejado Ka Rasta, Indira Bazar, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ashish Kabra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vineet Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order
05/12/2024
(AVNEESH JHINGAN), J
HS/56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the respondent bank withdraws the SARFAESI Section 13(2) and 13(4) notices.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Richa and Company (through Proprietor Rajeev Sharma)
IndusInd Bank Ltd. through its Regional Manager
IndusInd Bank Limited, Assistant Vice President-FRR Dept. and Authorised Officer
Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
