A two-line order: the petitioner did not press this writ petition, wishing instead to pursue an earlier writ petition already filed by him. The petition and the stay application were both dismissed as not pressed. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:34271]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13020/2024
Shyam Sundar S/o Shri Bharat Ram Meghwal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 30, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. SanjayNahar |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG assisted by Ms. Meenal Singhvi |
| Mr. Mudit Nagpal for Mr. Sanjeet Purohit |
|
| Mr. BS Sandhu |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
20/08/2024
(DINESH MEHTA),J
381-raksha/-
Shyam Sundar S/o Shri Bharat Ram Meghwal
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director-Cum-Joint Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur
The District Collector, Hanumangarh
The Municipal Corporation, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh Through Its Executive Officer
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
