Disposed

Prem Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC30 Aug 2024CW/12784/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a representation regarding his grievance. The court directed the competent authority to consider the representation within two weeks, clarifying that this does not mandate a specific outcome.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation; competent authority directed to consider it within two weeks.

Prem Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:36029]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12784/2024

¶4

Prem Singh S/o Shri Madho Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Jodia, Post Balli Jassakhera, Tehsil Bhim, District- Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶8

Director General, Anti Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, J-9, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶9

Additional Superintendent Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau Rajsamand, Old Collectorate Compound, Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

¶10

Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Balli Jassakhera, Tehsil Bhim, District- Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

¶11

Village Development Officer (Vdo), Gram Panchayat Balli Jassakhera, Tehsil Bhim, District- Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

¶12

Harish Tak S/o Shiri Lala Tak 9Husband Of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Balli Jassa Khera), Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village-Balli Jassakhera, Tehsil Bhim, DistrictRajsamand, Rajasthan.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Chandra Mali

¶15

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶16

Order

¶17

30/08/2024

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the appropriate direction be issued to the competent authority of the Panchayati Raj Department to expeditiously consider petitioner’s representation, which he would be filing within a period of fifteen days from today.

[2024:RJ-JD:36029]

[CW-12784/2024]

(2 of 2)

The petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation along with the certified copy of the order instant within the aforesaid period.

¶23

In case, any such representation is filed, the competent authority of the State Government shall consider the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks of receiving the same.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition so also the stay application stands disposed of.

¶25

It is, however, made clear that the direction to decide petitioner’s representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of his grievance and the same may not be construed to be a direction to decide it in a particular manner.

¶26

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶27

32-Arvind/-

Prem Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prem Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwari Devi Vs Board of Revenue

Mohan Singh Vs Sh. Subhash Chandra

Deva Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Salaam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Dula Ram Vs Union of India

Bheru Singh Vs Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur