A D.B. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was disposed of on a limited issue regarding the restriction of pension arrears. The High Court observed that the respondent is entitled to pension from the date of discharge on a settled legal position and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33165-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12283/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
Ex. Mwo Satya Narain Sharma, (Service No. 274194-K) S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, Aged 70 Years, Permanent Resident Of H-404, Sushant City-I, Machawa, Kalwar Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 303706
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manjeet Kaur For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
05/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:33165-DB]
[CW-12283/2024]
India & Ors. Vs. Tarsem Singh-2008 (8) SCC 648 decided on 13.08.2008.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
NAVAL KISHORE/DIVYA SAINI/ 17
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should restrict the grant of pension arrears despite the settled legal position entitling the respondent to pension arrears from the date of discharge.
Whether the writ petition challenging the grant of pension arrears should be dismissed or allowed.
Whether the peculiar circumstances of the case require restricting the relief for delay in granting pension.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Tarsem SinghReferred¶17
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Tarsem Singh-2008 (8) SCC 648 · Who else cites this
Union Of India & Ors.
Ex. Mwo Satya Narain Sharma
Ganesh Ram Meena
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
