The single judge dismissed the S.B. Civil Writ Petition as the petitioner, after being granted one more opportunity to rebut the respondents' submission that the petition was rendered infructuous, appeared with no instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:20516]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1224/2001
Gajendra Kaushik S/o Shri Brahmdutt Kaushik Aged about 33 years R/o 7 Devi Path Kanota Bagh Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
S.C. Gupta |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Satyendra Meena for |
| Mr. | K.S. Chandel | |
| Mr. | Yuvraj Samant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
01/05/2024
On last date, i.e., 24.04.2024, following order was passed:-
“Learned counsel for the respondents submits that this petition is rendered infructuous on account of subsequent development.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to rebut the aforesaid submission. However, in the interest of justice, he is granted one more opportunity to do so. List this matter on 01.05.2024 as ‘first case’ in the category of ‘oldest cases for early disposal’.”
Today, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction.
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
PRAGATI/1
Gajendra Kaushik
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
The State of Rajasthan
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
