Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner's counsel failed to provide instructions. Stay and pending applications consequently stood dismissed. Order of skeleton dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1169/2019
Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o Ganga Sahai Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhambhori Via Kalwar, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
07/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions from the petitioner.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, stay application
and all pending application/s, if any, shall stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /13
Vinod Kumar Sharma
The State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
Gaurav Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
