The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a writ petition challenging civil orders under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The petition was dismissed in default due to absence of petitioner, lack of filing required affidavits, and non-prosecution since 2008.
Scaling down the petition as per page 6, otherwise no new relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:27248]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1169/2010
Applicants/Objector/Petitioners
Versus
2/4 Smt. Neelu, D/o late Prem Chand Jain wife of Rishiraj Chhabra, resident of 2151/20, Mani-haron ka Rasta, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur.
Decree Holder/Plaintiffs/Respondents
3/1 Smt. Bhanwar Devi, widow of late Ladu Ram Jain. 3/1/1 Smt. Sneh Prabha Wife of Prem Chand, both residents of Jaipur City, Chokadi Modi Khana, Kishanpole Bazarm Rasta Bawrdaran, Jaipur.
[2024:RJ-JP:27248]
[CW-1169/2010]
JudgementDebtors/Defendents/ProformaRespondents
(2 of 2)
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/07/2024
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SOURAV /100
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending writ petition should be allowed due to lack of service and default of petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Vanita Sethi
Surendra Kumar
Addl. Civil Judge (senior Division), Jaipur
Legal representatives of late Prem Chand Jain
Legal Representatives of late Ladulal
Kailash Chand
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
