Disposed

M/S Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the Transport Commissioner

Rajasthan HC2 Apr 2024CW/1059/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of connected writ petitions filed by private companies against demand notices. Petitioners and respondents settled legal terms, quashing specific notices and granting liberty to issue fresh demands compliant with statutory procedure.

What did the court decide?

Quashed specific demand notice; liberty granted to respondents to issue fresh demand notice following Section 8A procedure.

M/S Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs the… — Company and Corporate | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:15373]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6511/2019

¶4

M/s Metso India Pvt.ltd, A Company Regd. Under Companies Act 1956, Having Its Plant At Sp1-1 To 13, South East Zone, Matshya Industrial Area, Alwar- 301030 Through Its Authorised Signatory Shri Trilok Gupta.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur

¶8

The Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Department Of Transport, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

¶10

The Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Department Of Transport, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

¶11

The District Transport Officer (Enforcement), Department Of Transport, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23866/2018

¶15

M/s Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Office At C-185, 2Nd Floor, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-Ii, New Delhi-110064 Through Its Authorised Signatory Shri Rajender Singh Rana

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

The Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport, Government Of Rajasthan, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶19

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Department Of Transport, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

¶20

The District Transport Officer (Enforcement), Department Of Transport, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.

----Respondents

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:15373]

[CW-6511/2019]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1059/2020

¶26

M/s Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Office At C-185, 2Nd Floor, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-Ii, New Delhi-110064 Through Its Authorised Signatory Shri. Ajay Kumar.

¶27

----Petitioner

¶28

Versus

¶29

The Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport, Government Of Rajasthan, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶30

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Department Of Transport, Near Lohagarh Stadium, Subhash Nagar, Bharatpur.

¶31

The District Transport Officer, Department Of Transport, Near Sadar Police Station, Bhagwant Garh, Dholpur 328001.

¶32

----Respondents

¶33

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Vagish Kumar Singh with Mr. Anupam Bhargava
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with
		Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore
		Mr. Pradeep Kalwania, GC
		Mr. Ramesh Chandra Meena,
		DTO (NT) OIC

¶34

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

¶35

Judgment / Order

¶36

02/04/2024

¶37

In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6511/2019:-

¶38

This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:-

¶39

“(i) The demand notice dated 02.04.2019 is quashed and set aside.

(3 of 3)

[CW-6511/2019]

[2024:RJ-JP:15373]

(ii) The respondents are at liberty to issue a fresh demand notice following the procedure prescribed under Section 8A of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951.”

¶44

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶45

In S.B. Civil Writ Petitions No.23866/2018 &

¶46

1059/2020:-

¶47

These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:-

¶48

“(i) The respondents are at liberty to raise demand of tax following the procedure provided under Section 8A of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951.”

¶49

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶50

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶51

PRAGATI/3-5

M/S Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Trenchless Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nawal Yadav S/O Bhagwan Sahai Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhu Dayal Jat S/O Shri Chauthmal Jat Vs Dinesh Sharma S/O Shri Prabhu Dayal Sharma

Lali Devi W/O Babulal Vs Dhansingh S/O Shivlal Tanwar

M/S Bhim Singh Trading Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu D/O Dharm Singh Dhanka Vs the State of Rajasthan

Santosh Swami W/O Daya Ram Swami Vs State of Rajasthan