Writ petition regarding non-acceptance of a bid dismissed as infructuous due to lack of petitioner's appearance and respondent's statement that the work has been executed over years, with liberty to file for revival.
Petition disposed as infructuous. Liberty granted to file application for revival if circumstances change.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:40187]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1029/2012
Hema Constructions Sole Proprietorship Firm Through Proprietor Harish Gaurav Son Of Shri Raghunath, 1/r/56, Gayatri Nagar, Sector 5, Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Mishra
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order
21/09/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:40187]
[CW-1029/2012]
(2 of 2)
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat /104
Hema Constructions Sole Proprietorship Firm Through Proprietor Harish Gaurav Son Of Shri Raghunath
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Through Its Chairman
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
