Allowed

Ajeem Shekh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Mar 2024CW/1023/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of the writ petition by directing the State Government to decide the issue of regularization of the petitioner's services strictly in accordance with law within four weeks, relying on the pre-existing judgment in Jitendra Kumar Tailor.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State Government to decide the matter of regularization of services within four weeks and issue requisite orders.

Ajeem Shekh Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:12718]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1023/2024

¶4

Ajeem Shekh S/o Shri Saleem Shekh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ratlam Road, Banswara (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Nagar Parishad Banswara, Through Its Commissioner. 4. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Banswara.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Darshan Jain
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Jubin Mehta for
		Mr. Pankaj Mehta
		Mr. Rajesh Parihar, through VC with
		Mr. KuldeepParihar

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

18/03/2024

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

¶16

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:12718]

[CW-1023/2024]

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶21

Learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶22

In view of the above fact situation, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶25

8-akansha/-

Ajeem Shekh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeem Shekh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lrs of Dalsukh Ram Alias Dilsukhram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Shankar Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Jagdish Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Nagesh Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Kushagrah Bhatt Vs State of Rajasthan

Rama Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan