Nisha Yadav v. Nitin
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the transfer of a matrimonial case under Section 13 HMA from Chittorgarh to Neem ka Thana citing distance and convenience for the female petitioner, mandating virtual appearance for the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Transfer of Case No. 223/2022 from Family Court, Chittorgarh to the Court of Additional District Judge No. 1, Neem ka Thana, District Sikar.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 149/2022
Nisha Yadav W/o Shri Nitin Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, At Present R/o Ward No. 7, Yadav Colony, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.
----Petitioner
Versus
Nitin S/o Shri Karan Singh Yadav, R/o 33, Nakoda Nagar, Senti, Chittorgarh.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gourav Thanvi |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
05/03/2024
- Heard the parties.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for transfer of matrimonial proceedings from Chittorgarh to Neem ka Thana due to distance should be allowed.
Whether virtual mode of appearance can be ensured for the respondent to prevent harassment after transfer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nisha Yadav W/o Shri Nitin Yadav
- respondent
Nitin S/o Shri Karan Singh Yadav
Coram
BIRENDRA KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CTA/149/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court