Dismissed
Narayan and Ors. v. Chunni Lal
Rajasthan HCCSA/75/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil second appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel could not contact them and no instructions were filed.
What did the court decide?
Civil second appeal and all interlocutory applications dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:1859]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 75/1995
¶4
- Legal Representatives of Narayan S/o Shri Vastaji
¶5
- 1/1. Champa Lal S/o Late Shri Narayan Ji Suthar
¶6
- 1/2. Gautam S/o Late Shri Narayan Ji Suthar
¶7
- 1/3. Smt. Meema D/o Late Shri Narayan Ji Suthar W/o Shri Ranchore Das Suthar
¶8
- 1/4. Smt. Uki Devi D/o Late Shri Narayan Ji Suthar W/o Shri Pema Ram Suthar.
¶9
All residents of Samdari, Tehsil Siwana District Barmer.
¶10
- Mohan Lal S/o Shri Ghamanda Ji, R/o Samdari, Tehsil Siwana District Barmer.
¶11
----Appellants
¶12
Versus
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Legal Representatives of Narayan S/o Shri Vastaji and others
- respondent
Legal Representatives of Late Shri Chunni Lal and others
Coram
AI extract
Madan Gopal Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CSA/75/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court