Gopi Chand v. Kedar Lal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal was disposed of as abated because all parties (appellant and respondents) had expired, with liberty to revive if execution proceedings commenced.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of as abated with liberty to revive if execution proceedings are initiated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:34662]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 540/1998
Gopi Chand S/o Shri Bajrang Lal, Sawaimadhopur
----Appellant
- Versus
- Kedar Lal S/o Soni Lal Swarankar, Behramda Kalan, City Sawaimadhopur
- Mst. Koshalya Devi W/o Gopi Chand Darji, City Sawaimadhopur
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Sakshi Tiwari |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Narendra Sharma for |
| Mr. N.K. Maloo, Sr. Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present second appeal abates due to the death of all parties involved since long.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gopi Chand S/o Shri Bajrang Lal
- respondent
Kedar Lal S/o Soni Lal Swarankar
- respondent
Mst. Koshalya Devi W/o Gopi Chand Darji
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CSA/540/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court