The learned counsel for the appellants stated there was no instruction in the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:15720]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 187/1998
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:15720]
[CSA-187/1998]
Distt. Sawaimadhopur
----Appellants
For Appellant(s) : Ms. Neha Goyal for Mr. S C Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
03/04/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:15720]
[CSA-187/1998]
(3 of 3)
Learned counsel for the appellants pleads no instruction in
this matter.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir/9
Gopi S/o Bhairu Gurjar and others
Ganga Ram S/o Narain and others
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
