Allowed
Mathura Lal v. Hans Raj and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCSA/134/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Bench allowed the appeal as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JP:230]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 134/2000
¶4
Mathura Lal S/o Shri Motilal, Ward No.7, Mangrol, Distt. Baran Raj.
¶5
----Appellant
¶6
Versus
¶7
- Hansraj S/o Shri Kanhapuri, Ward No.7, Mangrol, Distt. Baran Raj.
¶8
- Pana Bai W/o Kanhapuri, Ward No.7, Mangrol, Distt. Baran Raj.
¶9
- Panchayat Leelgaran, Through Chairman Abdul Aziz, Teacher, Near Veternary Hospital, Mangrol, Distt. Baran Raj.
¶10
----Respondents
¶11
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh, Adv., for Smt. Kamla Jain, Adv. For : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Jain, Adv. Respondent(s)
¶12
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mathura Lal
- respondent
Hansraj
- respondent
Pana Bai
- respondent
Panchayat Leelgaran
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CSA/134/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court