A parole petition challenged the District Parole Advisory Committee's condition requiring two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each for a 20-day parole. The court modified the order to require a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and one surety of Rs.50,000/- instead, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:17860-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 465/2024
Omprakash S/o Phula Ram, Aged About 49 Years, At Present Lodged In Open Air Camp, Sanganer Through His Son Lalchand Bamaniya S/o Shri Omprakash Age About 28 Years R/o Village Sahajasar, At Present Dheerwas Chota PS Taranagar District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, AAG
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
24/04/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:17860-DB]
[CRLW-465/2024]
(2 of 2)
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
67-nidhi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner be required to furnish two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each for a 20-day parole, given his poor financial condition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Omprakash S/o Phula Ram
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
The District Collector, Churu
The Superintendent, Central Jail Jaipur
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
