Disposed

Ramsingh S/O Shri Sadhuram @ Sandhya v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2024CRLW/2429/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, convicted under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, sought permanent parole. The Court held that since the conviction predated the 2021 Rules, the 1958 Rules apply. The writ petition was disposed of by directing the Committee to consider the parole application within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Committee to consider parole application within two months.

Ramsingh S/O Shri Sadhuram @ Sandhya Vs the State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:6390]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2429/2023

¶4

Ramsingh S/o Shri Sadhuram @ Sandhya, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Maliyo Ki Dhani Tan Shyampura, Police Station Bansur, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar), Through His Nephew Shivam Saini S/o Shri Laxman Prasad Saini, Aged About 20 Years R/o Maliyo Ki Dhani Tan Shyampura, Police Station Bansur, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan.

¶9

Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vishram Prajapati
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶13

Order

¶14

07/02/2024

¶15

Instant writ petition (parole) has been filed by petitioner, seeking directions against respondents to release the petitioner on permanent parole.

¶16

Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was convicted vide judgment dated 06.07.2020 for offence u/s. 376(2) (i) IPC and sentenced to undergo twelve years’ RI with fine. Since, the petitioner was convicted vide judgment dated 06.07.2020, prior to implementation of new rules i.e. Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021, the case of permanent parole of

[2024:RJ-JP:6390]

[CRLW-2429/2023]

(2 of 2)

petitioner would be governed by the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter for short “the Rules of 1958”), and as per Rule 9 of the Rules of 1958, applications dated 13.07.2023 for permanent parole was filed by the petitioner and the same are still pending for consideration by the Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (hereinafter for short “the Committee”).

¶21

Taking into consideration the limited prayer of petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present criminal writ petition with direction to the Committee to consider the application filed by petitioner, in respect of grant of permanent parole, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

¶22

All other pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed.

¶23

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶24

Sachin/567

Ramsingh S/O Shri Sadhuram @ Sandhya v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramsingh S/O Shri Sadhuram @ Sandhya v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritu D/O Shri Ajay Kumar, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Bai Meena Daughter of Batturam Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhup Singh Son of Sh. Vikram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharat Choudhary @ Bhola S/O Goverdhan Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Antar Lal S/O Sh. Sita Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Khemchand Son of Shri Kantiram Jatav, Vs State of Rajasthan