Disposed

Adaki Kumari Alias Adro Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Sept 2024CRLW/1889/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1889/2024 directed the Superintendent of Police and relevant police stations to verify the threat perception of two adult petitioners planning cohabitation before their marital decision. The court clarified that this direction did not constitute a judicial approval of their live-in relationship.

What did the court decide?

Direction to police authorities to verify threat perception and take requisite steps for protection of life and liberty.

Adaki Kumari Alias Adro Kumari Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:36935]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1889/2024

¶4

Adaki Kumari Alias Adro Kumari D/o Vachnaram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Tura Tehsil Sayla District Jalore.

¶5

Ruparam S/o Saluram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Rajpura Dist. Jalore.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Jalore.

¶10

Sho, Police Station, Jaswantpura.

¶11

Sho, Police Station, Raniwara.

¶12

Ganesh Ram S/o Hakmaram, R/o Tura.

¶13

Hakmaram Dewasi, R/o Raniwara.

¶14

Megharam S/o Saluram Dewasi, Rajpura.

¶15

Harsan Dwasi, Raniwara. 9. Naresh Kumar S/o Hakma Ram, R/o Mandari, Raniwara.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarwan Saini. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Choudhary, PP

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶19

Order

¶20

04/09/2024

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

Perused contents of the petition along with Annexures thereof.

¶23

Pleaded case is that both petitioners are major. They intend to get married and before they take a decision, they have decided to live together. Both are adults, petitioner No.1 being 25 years old and petitioner No.2 being 25 years old and, thus fully capable

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:36935]

[CRLW-1889/2024]

and legally competent to take decision to choose their respective life partners.

¶28

In the premise, petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4, i.e. Superintendent Of Police, Jalore; SHO P.S. Jaswantpura and SHO P.S. Raniwada, respectively, to verify or get verified the threat perception of the petitioners. If warranted, requisite steps be taken, in accordance with law for grant of protection of life and liberty to the petitioners as they apprehend threat at the hands of private respondents. It is clarified that this order shall neither be treated as a stamp of this Court qua live-inrelationship of the petitioners nor any reflection on the merits of the contentions raised by them in the present petition.

¶29

Present petition stands disposed of.

¶30

(ARUN MONGA),J

¶31

473-Rmathur/-

Adaki Kumari Alias Adro Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adaki Kumari Alias Adro Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taru Ram and Ors. Vs State

State of Raj. and Ors. Vs M/S.Giutam Trading Company

State of Raj. and Ors. Vs M/S. Sajjan Trading Company

M/S Hasti Petro Chemical and Shipping Ltd. Vs Union of India

Kanahaiya Lal @ Karan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Vinita Devi Golecha Vs Union of India