Petitioner on parole could not furnish an attested surety required under the Parole Advisory Committee's order. The court modified the 05.02.2024 order, releasing him on third regular parole against a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and waiving the surety condition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1753/2024
Babu Chandra Rai @ Parimal Chandra S/o Shri Titendra Rai, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Baroragras, Police Station Kotwali, Distt. Kuchvihar, West Bengal, Present Address - House No. 52, Jagannathpuri, 2Nd Triveni Nagar, Police Station Shipra Path, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Open Air Camp Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Tekchand Swami |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. Govt. |
| Advocate |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
28/11/2024
(2 of 2) [CRLW-1753/2024]
third parole was allowed by Parole Advisory Committee on 05.02.2024, a period of more than 9 months has lapsed still petitioner could not furnish surety.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
HEENA/105
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition of furnishing one attested surety for the petitioner's third regular parole could be waived given his inability to furnish surety in prior paroles?
Babu Chandra Rai @ Parimal Chandra
State of Rajasthan
District Magistrate, Jaipur
Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur
Pankaj Bhandari
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
