Criminal revision petition from 2003 dismissed because the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on multiple listed dates, including the date of order. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution; no substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[CRLR-852/2003]
(1 of 1)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 852/2003
Shimbhu S/o Makhan Saini, R/o village Rajnota, P.S. Pragpura district Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, DY.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
06/11/2024
After perusing the order sheets it is reveled that on 24.07.2024, 31.07.2024, 21.08.2024, 11.09.2024 and 09.10.2024 nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, instant revision petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ashu /5
Shimbhu S/o Makhan Saini
Shimbhudayal S/o Gyarsilal
Pappu S/o Bhagwan Sahay
Kailash S/o Shimbhudayal
Arjun S/o Bagda Ram
Girwar S/o Gyarsilal
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
