Rohit v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur rejected a criminal revision petition challenging the framing of charges under Sections 304B and 498A IPC. The court held that the trial court correctly found prima facie ingredients of dowry death and cruelty based on the investigation report, and accordingly set aside the lower court's order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:12871]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 76/2024
Rohit S/o Shri Sitaram Acharya, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gulab Sagar, Bachcho Ki Gali, Jodhpur, P.s. Sadar Kotwali, Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur City.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
- Dinesh S/o Shri Madanlal Acharya, R/o Khinvsar, P.s. Khinvsar, Dist. Nagaur.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. K.L. Thakur |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP |
| Mr. Kishan Singh Chouhan |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court committed an error of law in framing charges under Sections 304B and 498A IPC?
Whether the prima facie allegations in the challan establish the ingredients of dowry death and cruelty?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohit S/o Shri Sitaram Acharya
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Dinesh S/o Shri Madanlal Acharya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/76/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court