The Single Judge Bench dismissed a pending Criminal Revision Petition for want of prosecution, noting the petitioner had lost interest and failed to cure defects for several years, while reserving liberty to revive the matter.
The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24419]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 661/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
22/05/2024
This revision petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and he has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
In view of the above, the revision petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2024:RJ-JP:24419]
[CRLR-661/2019]
(2 of 2)
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this revision petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Garima/229
Vinod Kumar S/o Banshilal and Others
State Of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
