Nana v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In revision petitions challenging conviction and sentence for theft, the court reduced the sentence to the period already undergone and discharged bail bonds.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; bail bonds discharged; two months' time granted to deposit fine.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:22223]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 528/2004
Nana S/o Mangilal R/o Ramdev Ji Ka Chandaria P.S. Chandaria, District Chittorgarh
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 529/2004
Hema S/o Udai Ram R/o Ramdev Ji Ka Chandaria P.S. Chandaria, District Chittorgarh
----Petitioner
Versus
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the enhanced sentence awarded in an old case can be reduced to the period already undergone.
Whether bail bonds should be discharged when the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nana
- petitioner
Hema
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/528/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court