Dismissed

Sharwan Saini v. State and Ors.

Rajasthan HC24 Apr 2024CRLR/444/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition challenging a magistrate's acquittal of two women accused of assault. The court found serious discrepancies in the FIR dates, medical evidence inconsistent with the alleged occurrence date, non-examination of independent eye-witnesses, and unnecessary implication of nine persons, holding the acquittal proper and dismissing the revision.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sharwan Saini Vs State and Ors. — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:19227]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 444/2004

¶4

Sharwan Saini son of Shri Bhagwan Sahai Samit, Resident of Opposite Nehru Park, House No.14, Neem-Ka-Thana, Sikar, Distt. Sikar.

¶5

----Petitioner-Complainant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan through P.P.

¶8

Smt. Nangi Devi Wife of Kishan Lal

¶9

Koshaliya Wife of Suresh, Resident of Ward No.14, Neem-Ka-Thana, Sikar, Distt. Sikar.

¶10

----Non-Petitioner-Accused

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishawajeet Mantri, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

24/04/2024

¶15

ifjoknh@;kph dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] uhedkFkkuk }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 231@2002 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 21-06-2003 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls izR;FkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k Jherh ukuxh nsoh o Jherh dks'kY;k dks /kkjk 323] 341] 325 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksiksa ls lansg dk ykHk nsrs gq, nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gSA

¶16

izR;FkhZ i{k dh vksj ls ckotwn rkehy uksfVl dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

[CRLR-444/2004]

[2024:RJ-JP:19227]

(2 of 4)

fo}ku ;kph@ifjoknh dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) nks"kflf) dh i;kZIr lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k Fkh] ysfdu blds ckotwn rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr tkdj vfHk;qDrx.k dks nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gS] vr% vk{ksfir fu.kZ; vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶21

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/klEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

ifjoknh Jo.k }kjk fnukad 21-03-2002 dks iqfyl Fkkuk&uhedkFkkuk esa ,d fyf[kr fjiksVZ izn'kZ ih-3 ntZ djokdj vkjksi yxk;k fd izkr% 7-30 cts mldh vuqifLFkfr esa mlds [ksr ij lqjs'k] fd'ku] cnzh] egkohj] uhjt] izdk'k] ukuxh] lqHkk"k] dks'kY;k dqy 09 O;fDr ,djk; gksdj vk;s rFkk mldh ?kj dh vkSjrksa ds diMs QkM fn;s] ykr ?kqalksa ls ekjihV dj yTtk Hkax dhA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 38@02 ntZ dj vuqla/kku ds mijkar eftLVªsV U;k;ky; esa vkjksii= ek= ukuxh nsoh o dks'kY;k ds fo:) is'k fd;kA 'ks"k vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl ?kVuk esa fyIr ugha ekuk x;kA ckn fopkj.k mijksDrkuqlkj vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;kA

¶23

bl izdj.k esa ?kVuk fnukad 21-03-02 dks lqcg 7-30 cts dh crk;h x;h gS tcfd izn'kZ ih- 3 fyf[kr fjiksVZ fnukad 20-03-02 dks gh vFkkZr dfFkr ?kVuk ls iwoZ gh lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkus esa is'k dh tk pqdh FkhA dk;Zokgh iqfyl esa fnukad 20-0302 11-00 ,-,e- fnukad o le; vafdr fd;k x;k gS] ysfdu ckn esa iqfyl }kjk dkaV NkaV dj fnukad 21-03-02 fd;k gSA fyf[kr fjiksVZ esa Hkh ifjoknh }kjk izFke i`"V ij fnukad

¶24

(3 of 4) [CRLR-444/2004]

¶25

[2024:RJ-JP:19227]

¶26

20-03-02 dks dkaVdj fnukad 21-03-02 fd;k x;k gS] ysfdu f}rh; i`"B ij fnukad 20-03-02 gh jgh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ?kVuk okLro esa dc ?kfVr gqbZ] bl ckcr xaHkhj fojks/kkHkkl gSA

¶27

bl ekeys esa irklh o pkoyh nks efgykvksa dk vkgr gksuk crk;k gS] irklh dk fpfdRldh; ijh{k.k MkW- lqjsUnz ihMCY;w-&1 }kjk fd;k x;k gS ftlus tkfgj fd;k gS fd fnukad 21-03-02 dks vkgr dk ijh{k.k fd;k rks mlds cka;s psgjs o tcMs ij dze'k% lk/kkj.k o xaHkhj izd`fr dh pksVsa Fkh] tks 12 ?kaVs ds Hkhrj dh FkhA fpfdRldh; ijh{k.k 1-00 ih-,e- ij gqvk gSA okLro esa ?kVuk fnukad 20-03-02 dks ?kfVr gqbZ gksrh rks ;g pksVsa 12 ?kaVs ds Hkhrj dh ugha gks ldrh Fkh A

¶28

vkgr pkoyh ih-MCY;w-&4 us tkfgj fd;k gS fd lHkh eqyfteku us djhc ,d&Ms< ?kaVs ekjihV dh ftlls og csgks'k gks x;h Fkh] ysfdu ,slk dksbZ pksV izfrosnu vfHkys[k ij ugha gSA Li"V gS fd vfHk;kstu dgkuh dh iqf"V fpfdRldh; lk{; ls ugha gksrh gSA

¶29

tSlkfd Åij mYys[k fd;k x;k gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dqy 09 vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ntZ djok;h x;h Fkh] ysfdu ekeyk dsoy nks vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) gh izekf.kr ekuk x;k Fkk] blls Li"V gksrk gS fd ifjoknh i{k us vuko';d :i ls dqN O;fDr;ksa dks vfHk;qDRkx.k ds :i esa fyIr fd;k gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izR;{kn'khZ xokg jktw lSuh] Kkupan o xqytkjh dk gksuk crk;k gS] ysfdu bu rhuksa gh Lora= izR;{kn'khZ xokgku dks vfHk;kstu i{k }kjk fopkj.k

¶30

(4 of 4) [CRLR-444/2004]

¶31

[2024:RJ-JP:19227]

¶32

ds nkSjku ijhf{kr ugha djok;k x;k gSA okLro esa ;g xokg ijhf{kr gksrs rks izfrijh{kk ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDrx.k dks okLrfod fLFkfr vfHkys[k ij ykus o vius cpko dk ;qfDr;qDr volj izkIr gksrkA vfHk;qDrx.k bl volj ls oafpr gq, gSaA Lora= xokg dh lk{; ds vHkko esa Hkh vfHk;kstu dgkuh lansgkLin gks tkrh gSA

¶33

mijksDr laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks fopkj esa ysus ds mijkar fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDRkx.k dh nks"keqfDr ds laca/k esa vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vk{ksfir fu.kZ; iw.kZr% rF;ksa] fof/k o miyC/k lk{; ds vuq:i gS] ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA

¶34

bl izdkj ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj gksus ,oa vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 21-06-03 iq"V gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶35

ifj.kker% izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS ,oa vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 21-06-03 dh iq"Vh dh tkrh gSA

¶36

fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA

¶37

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶38

Murari Lal Sharma /6

Sharwan Saini v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sharwan Saini v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash S/O Shri Rambilas Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra S/O Puranmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Nasim S/O Shri Ikbal Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Rathore S/O Shri Mukesh Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahender Kumar Vs State

Pankaj Natani S/O Shri Ghanshyam Natani, Vs State of Rajasthan