Allowed

Ashok Banta S/O Mangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2024CRLR/161/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition, holding that the trial court's order was non-speaking and vitiated. The court directed the trial court to decide the petitions afresh after hearing parties and issuing a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Revision allowed; trial court directed to decide petitions afresh after hearing parties and passing a reasoned order.

Ashok Banta S/O Mangaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:6356]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 161/2024

¶4

Ashok Banta S/o Mangaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o B- 24, Panchsheel Nagar, Thana Christian Ganj Ajmer (Raj)

¶5

Smt. Manju W/o Mahendra Choudhary, R/o B-24, Panchsheel Nagar, Thana Christian Ganj, Ajmer (Raj)

¶6

Jitendra Banta S/o Mangaram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o B-24, Panchsheel Nagar, Thana Christian Ganj Ajmer (Raj)

¶7

Smt. Santosh W/o Ashok Banta, Aged About 28 Years, R/o B-24, Panchsheel Nagar, Thana Christian Ganj, Ajmer (Raj)

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor Ajmer

¶11

Mahendra Choudhary S/o Ramlal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Indawar Station Gotan, Nagaur (Raj)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, P.P.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶15

Order

¶16

07/02/2024

¶17

;kph dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 06-12-2023] ftlds rgr ;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vijk/k /kkjk 323@34] 307@34] 440@34 Hkk0na0la0 ds rgr vkjksi fojfpr fd, x, Fks] ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶18

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 06-12-2023 dks vkjksi laca/kh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 307 ds laca/k esa dqN Hkh vafdr ugha fd;k x;k gS] et:c egsUnz pkS/kjh dks dksbZ Hkh pksV ,slh dkfjr ugha gqbZ

[2024:RJ-JP:6356]

[CRLR-161/2024]

(2 of 2)

gS] tks izk.k?kkrd gksA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk vius vkjksi i= esa Li"V rkSj ij vafdr fd;k gS fd et:c egsUnz pkS/kjh ds laca/k esa esfMdy T;wfjLV] ts-,y-,u- vtesj ls jk; izkIr dh xbZ] esfMdy T;wfjLV }kjk et:c ds 'kjhj ij vkbZ pksVsa izk.k?kkrd gksuk ugha crk;k gS rFkk ;g Hkh vafdr fd;k gS fd et:c egsUnz pkS/kjh dh vka[k dh pksV Hkh izk.k?kkrd ugha gksdj lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh ikbZ xbZ gS] ijarq fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk bu rF;ksa ij xkSj ugha fd;k gS rFkk Li"V vkns'k ikfjr ugha fd;k gSA vr% v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k vikLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk mudk fuosnu gS fd et:c }kjk vius c;kuksa esa leLr ?kVuk dk fooj.k fn;k gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/klEer gksuk izdV djrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶24

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa fordksZa ij euu fd;k] esfMdy nLrkostkr dk Hkh voyksdu fd;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;kph@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fojfpr fd, x, vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa Li"V ,oa ldkj.k vkns'k ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS] vr% ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph }kjk izLrqr fd, x, rdksZa ,oa vk{ksfir vkns'k esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 06-12-2023] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) fojfpr fd, x, vkjksiksa dh gn rd vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks iqu% lquokbZ dk volj nsrs gq,] bl vkns'k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] ;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus ds laca/k esa ldkj.k] Li"V ,oa fof/klEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkosA

¶25

mijksDr funsZ'k ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk ,oa LFkxu izkFkZuk i= fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶26

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶27

MAHESH ADWANI /74

Ashok Banta S/O Mangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Banta S/O Mangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bunty @ Gautam Prakash Son of Shri Mannu Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra @ Balya Gurjar S/O Shri Chajuram Gujar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Prakash Chand Verma Son of Shri Chhoturam, Vs Karan Singh Shekhawat Son of Late Shri Hukam Singh

Dinesh S/O Shri Parsadi Vs State of Rajasthan

Nandkishore @ Ballu @ Bulya Son of Radheyshyam, Vs State of Rajasthan