In a Criminal Revision Petition, the petitioner argued the revision became infructuous as the trial concluded. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition on that ground.
Original petition dismissed as infructuous; Stay application and pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1445/2009
Smt. Sheela Devi W/o Vijay Pal, Resident of Town Kaman District Bharatput at present Parshad of Ward No. 12, Nagarpalika, Kaman (Bharatpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan-PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
27/05/2024
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has been concluded, hence under these circumstances, this revision petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/101
Smt. Sheela Devi
The State of Rajasthan
Banwari Lal Raman
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
