Ghanshyam Bandhu v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition abated due to the death of the petitioner during pendency.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1283/2009
?ku”;ke cU/kq iq= Jh :i pUnz] vk;q 65 o’kZ] fuoklh v.kph dk ckl] ckUnhdqbZ] ftyk nkSlkA
----Petitioner
Versus
1- jktLFkku jkT;A
2- lhrkjke iq= jkeizrki] fuoklh ihijkyh <k.kh] ru Mksfydk] iqfyl Fkkuk dksyok] ftyk nkSlkA
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma-PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
29/05/2024
Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has expired. Hence under these circumstances, the proceedings of the instant matter stands abated.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shri Pankaj
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Shri Harshke Jaisingh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1283/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court