Revision petition challenging a Bundi trial court order acquitting respondents under IPC Sections 448, 323, 341 and 307/34 and convicting Chiranji under Section 325 with probation benefit. No petitioner representative appeared; court upheld the trial judgment and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1022/2005
Ramesh Saini S/o Shree Lal Saini R/o Nainwa, at present Agersen Vihar Colony, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP Mr. S K Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
13/03/2024
(2 of 3) [CRLR-1022/2005]
[CRLR-1022/2005]
(3 of 3)
and injury sustained to Ramesh at his head was found to be from the blunt side of axe. Had it been the intention to cause death, the accused could have inflicted more injuries to the injured Ramesh.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ashu /24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the acquittals and conviction with probation granted by the trial court in the 09.09.2005 order should be disturbed through criminal revision?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramesh Saini
State of Rajasthan
Chiranji
Om Prakash @ Ram Prakash
Rajendra
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
