High Court allowed Misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise between parties, discharging petitioners from charges including Section 120-B IPC.
Proceedings from FIR No.302/2020 quashed; petitioners discharged from charge under Section 120-B IPC; stay applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50567]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8283/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Prasad Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Mahesh Chand Meena
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
09/12/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:50567]
[CRLMP-8283/2024]
(2 of 3)
Station Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur City (South) pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.08, Jaipur Metropolitan-I for the offences under Section 420, 406 and 120-B IPC.
[2024:RJ-JP:50567]
[CRLMP-8283/2024]
(3 of 3)
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/69
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties.
Whether the High Court can discharge the petitioners under Section 528 BNSS despite non-compoundability of charge under Section 120-B IPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabApplied¶21
2012 (10) SCC 303 · Who else cites this
The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi NarayanApplied¶21
2019 (5) SCC 688 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramkesh Meena
Maya Devi
Smt. Vidhya Devi
State of Rajasthan
Ramkumar Lodha
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
