The dismissal of S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition as infructuous because the required forfeiture report was not submitted by the public prosecutor, and the incidental stay petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:26696]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 794/2024
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sk Mehar,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
03/07/2024
Learned public prosecutor has submitted a detailed factual report contending therein that after conducting thorough investigation, a negative FR has been chalked out however the same has not been submitted with the concerned Court. The FR chalked out be submitted before the concerned Court as early as possible.
In view of the above, this misc. petition is dismissed as infructuous. The stay petition also stands disposed of.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
399-Arti/-
Dayal Lal Solanki
Pushkar Solanki
Kailashi Devi
Sugan Devi
Sita Devi
Chanda Devi
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
