The High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition and quashied the FIR on sections 420, 406, and 120-B of IPC based on a compromise reached between the parties. A stay petition was also disposed of.
Impugned FIR No. 259/2022 and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside; the stay petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:7862]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7759/2023
Sanjay Sharma S/o Shiv Ram Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o B-4/84 Udap Colony, Nehru Colony, South Delhi.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP |
| Mr. Devilal Paliwal,for complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
14/02/2024
None present for the petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-7759/2023]
[2024:RJ-JD:7862]
of IPC and all consequential proceedings initiated therein are quashed and set aside.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
240-Dinesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition should be allowed on account of compromise between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Aman Bhadu
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
