The court disposed of the petition for quashing the FIR as infructuous because the Investigating Officer had completed the investigation and proposed submitting a negative final report to the court, finding the dispute to be of a civil nature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33214]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 774/2024
----Petitioners
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vipul Ojha for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Kapil Gupta | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
05/08/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report, from which it is clear that after completing the investigation, the Investigating Officer has prepared and proposed to submit negative final report before the court concerned as Adam Vaku on the ground that dispute between parties was found to be of civil in nature.
In this view of the matter, the present criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing the FIR No. 263/2023, has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Ritu/343
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing the FIR remains maintainable after the Investigating Officer proposes to submit a negative final report?
Asger Ali
Jakir
State Of Rajasthan
Munir Khan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
