Petition sought quashing of a dowry-related FIR. Court declined to quash but directed no arrest during investigation, invoking Section 41-A CrPC and Arnesh Kumar; bail on same day if charge-sheeted.
No-arrest direction during investigation; same-day bail on charge-sheet submission; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:15108]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7608/2023
----Petitioners
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta For Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
04/04/2024
[CRLMP-7608/2023]
[2024:RJ-JD:15108]
(2 of 2)
(FARJAND ALI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.No.167
2 issues framed by the court
Whether FIR No.301/2023 under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC against the petitioners should be quashed.
How the petitioners' liberty should be protected during investigation given the maximum punishment of three years.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr.Applied¶5
AIR 2014 SC 2756 · Who else cites this
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Abbas Mev
Noor Habib Mev
Sardub Mev
Menaj Mev
State Of Rajasthan
Rani Bano Mev
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
