Petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an impugned order. Learned counsel stated the petition has become infructuous, and the petition was dismissed as not pressed with pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:25196]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners/Accused
Versus
…….Respondent
---Complainant-Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Hariom Yadav for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Umesh Vyas | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Chandragupt Chopra, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
27/05/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:25196]
[CRLMP-7566/2021]
the petition has rendered infructuous, therefore, he does not want
to press this petition.
stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/691
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxminarayan and Anr.
State Of Rajasthan and Ors.
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
