Disposed

Ramniwas Daga v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Mar 2024CRLMP/730/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jodhpur dismissed a petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 482 CrPC. The complainant sought to settle the case, but the police had not initiated investigation. The Court held that since no investigation was started, the petition for quashment was maintainable, but expressly directed the petitioner to seek investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC to preserve the complain

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; direction to file an application under Section 156(3) CrPC.

Ramniwas Daga Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:12616]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 730/2024

¶4

Ramniwas Daga S/o Shri Gopi Kishan Daga, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bada Bas, Mathaniya, Teh Tinwari, Dist Jodhpur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Jaipur.

¶9

The Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.

¶10

The Inspector General Of Police, Acb, Jaipur.

¶11

The Superintendent Of Police, District Sirohi.

¶12

SHO, PS Kotwali, Dist Sirohi.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramniwas Daga, Petitioner Present in person.

¶15

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Gouri, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Judgment

¶17

18/03/2024

¶18

1- ;kph dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk bl vk/kkj ij izLrqr dh xbZ gS fd mlds Lo;a ds }kjk iqfylFkkuk dksrokyh fljksgh esa fyf[kr fjiksVZ egsUnz esokM+k] jhdks vf/kdkfj;ksa] lc jftLVªkj dk;kZy; ds vf/kdkfj;ksa o deZpkfj;ksa ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh vkSj iqfyl v/kh{kd] fljksgh dks Hkh tfj;s Mkd Hksth x;hA ijUrq ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- ntZ dj mlesa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZA vr% /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ dj dk;Zokgh djus dk funsZ”k fn;s tkus gsrq ;g fofo/k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- cgl ,Mfe”ku lquh xbZA ;kph Lo;a }kjk cgl djrs gq, ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`’Vkar Lalita Kumari vs. State of Uttar Pradish and Others, (2014)2 SCC 1 o Sindhu Janak Nagargoje Vs. The State of

[2024:RJ-JD:12616]

[CRLMP-730/2024]

(2 of 3)

Maharashtra and Others Criminal Appeal No. 2351/2023 date of Judgement 08-08-2023 dks vk/kkj cukdj ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dh ;g ftEesnkjh gS fd muds le{k fjiksVZ is”k djus ij ml ij vko”;d :i ls eqdnek ntZ djsA ijUrq iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk eqdnek ntZ ugha fd;k blfy, bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr eqdnek ntZ dj vuqla/kku djus dk vkns”k fn;s tkus dk fuosnsu fd;k x;kA

¶23

3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk bldk l[r fojks/k dj ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd Fkkukf/kdkjh o iqfyl v/kh{kd }kjk dk;Zokgh ugha djus dh lwjr esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; esa ;kph ifjokn is”k djus esa l{ke gSA lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ifjokn esa laKs; vijk/k ds rF; gksus ij /kkjk 156¼3½ n.M izfØ;k lafgrk esa eqdnek ntZ dj vuqla/kku ds vkns”k ns ldrk gSA /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;kfpdk esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk vkns”k fn;k tkuk fof/klEer ugha gSA

¶24

4- eSaus mijksDr rdksaZ ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk lko/kkuhiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA n.M izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 154¼1½ esa iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k fjiksVZ is”k djus ij fjiksVZ ntZ djus dk izko/kku gS vkSj ;kph }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n’Vkarksa esa Hkh iqfyl vf/kdkjh dks eqdnek ntZ djus dk vkKkid izko/kku gksus dk mYys[k gSA bu U;kf;d n’Vkarksa esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us yfyrk dqekjh okys ekeys esa fn”kkfunsZ”k Hkh tkjh fd;s gSaA

¶25

5- /kkjk 154¼1½ n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr Fkkukf/kdkjh }kjk eqdnek ntZ ugha djus ij /kkjk 154¼3½ ds rgr iqfyl v/kh{kd ds le{k jftLVMZ Mkd ls fuosnu fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl ekeys esa ;kph }kjk crk;k x;k fd mlds }kjk Fkkukf/kdkjh o iqfyl v/kh{kd ds le{k fjiksVZ dh xbZ ftlesa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha gqbZA

¶26

6- tc Fkkukf/kdkjh o iqfyl v/kh{kd }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkrh gS rks ,slh voLFkk esa lacaf/kr U;kf;d eftLVªsV ds le{k ifjoknh ifjokn is”k djus dk vf/kdkjh gS vkSj ifjoknh }kjk ifjokn is”k djus ij ifjokn esa of.kZr rF;kas ls laKs; vijk/k gksuk ik;s tkus dh lwjr esa lacaf/kr U;kf;d eftLVªsV ;fn mfpr le>s rks /kkjk 200 o 202 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr tkap Lo;a dj ldrk gS vFkok /kkjk

¶27

[2024:RJ-JD:12616]

¶28

[CRLMP-730/2024]

¶29

156¼3½ n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr eqdnek ntZ dj vuqla/kku dk vkns”k fn;k tk ldrk gSA

¶30

7- bl ekeys esa ;kph dks l{ke U;kf;d eftLVªsV ds le{k dk;Zokgh djus dk vf/kdkj miyC/k gSA ,slh voLFkk esa ;kph dks loZizFke l{ke U;kf;d eftLVªsV ds le{k bl laca/k esa dk;Zokgh djuh pkfg,A /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds vf/kdkjksa ds rgr Fkkukf/kdkjh dks eqdnek ntZ dj vuqla/kku djus dk vkns”k fn;k tkuk bl ekeys esa fof/klEer izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶31

8- vr% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶32

9- ;kph l{ke U;kf;d eftLVªsV ds le{k ifjokn izLrqr djus ds fy, Lora= jgsxkA

¶33

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶34

306-S N LOHRA/-

Ramniwas Daga v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramniwas Daga v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohemmed Fareed Vs Memuna

Sanjay Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan

Jeta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mathri @ Radha Vs State of Rajasthan