The High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of an FIR as infructuous since the investigating agency proposed a final report in the accused's favor, leaving no issue to be adjudicated.
The petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:11793]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6633/2023
Madan Mohan Sodhani S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 09, Nawa, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.
----Petitioner
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order
11/03/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record the latest factual report dated 07.03.2024 and submitted that the investigating agency after making a thorough investigation in connection with F.I.R. No.184/2023, registered at Police Station Nawa City, District Nagaur, has proposed a negative Final Report qua the present petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in view of the fact that a negative Final Report has been proposed qua the present petitioner before the competent criminal court, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present misc. petition.
Consequently, the present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
The petitioner however shall be at liberty to take up legal recourse, if need arises.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
303-divya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. requires adjudication in light of the proposed negative final report by the investigating agency.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madan Mohan Sodhani
State of Rajasthan
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
