Accused filed Section 482 CrPC petition to quash an FIR for cheating and forgery offences. Counsel did not pursue the petition on merits as it had become infructuous with passage of time. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:9148]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6347/2015
Yogesh Kumar S/o Shri Buddha Singh, R/o Pahuaa P.s. Kumher Distt. Bharatpur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena,PP Mr. R.P. Garg
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
22/02/2024
(SUDESH BANSAL), J
TN/32
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No.373/2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC be quashed under Section 482 Cr.PC?
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Yogesh Kumar
State of Rajasthan through PP
Pushpendra Singh
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
