High Court at Jaipur denied prayer to quash FIR alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy, finding involved cognizable offences despite prior suit. Investigation directed to include earlier FIR.
Prayer for quashing of FIR set aside and criminal misc. petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:1050]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 58/2024
Ramdas Chela Mohardas, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Jamat Udaipurwati, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
08/01/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:1050]
[CRLMP-58/2024]
submits that the impugned FIR is merely an off-suit of the FIR lodged by petitioner and the dispute between parties is of civil nature, therefore, the same be quashed.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:1050]
[CRLMP-58/2024]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
Pcg/379
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised to quash the FIR as the dispute is civil in nature.
Whether the criteria laid down in State of Haryana V. Bhajan Lal attract to the present case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana V. Bhajan LalFollowed¶19
State of Haryana V. Bhajan Lal [1992 Supp(1) SCC 335] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramdas Chela Mohardas
State Of Rajasthan
Prahlad Gurjar
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
