Dismissed

Ramhans v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2024CRLMP/468/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to take averances and subsequently dismissed it as withdrawn. In a connected petition, the court disposed of the matter as infructuous following the submission of a charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw petition 468/2015 with liberty to file averances before trial court; petition 5406/2014 disposed of as infructuous.

Ramhans Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:41830]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 468/2015

¶4

Ramhans son of Shri Guman Singh, resident of Badi Ki Dhani Amabara PS. Bamanwas District Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan

¶8

Kajodi @ Ramkanya wife of Late Shri Kamal Singh Gurjar aged about 35 years, resident of Badi Ki Dhani Amabara PS Bamanwas District Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5406/2014

¶12

Smt. Kajodi @ Ramkanya wife of Late Shri Kamal Singh Gurjar aged about 35 years, resident of Badi Ki Dhani Amabara PS Bamanwas District Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan through PP

¶16

Superintendent of Police, District Sawaimadhopur

¶17

SHO, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s)	:	Ms. Faziya G. Khan for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan in criminal misc. petition No. 468/2015 Mr. Umang Jain in criminal misc. petition No. 5406/2015
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. G A Ms. Faziya G. Khan for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan in criminal misc. petition No. 5406/2014 Mr. Umang Jain in criminal misc. petition No.468/2015

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

01/10/2024

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:41830]

[CRLMP-468/2015]

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 468/2015

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to take all the averments, as raised in this petition, before the trial Court.

¶28

Permission, as sought for, is granted.

¶29

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶30

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5406/2014

¶31

Learned Dy. G A appearing for the State has submitted the factual report from which it is clear that after completing the investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet against the accused persons.

¶32

In view of the matter, the petition filed by the petitioner, has been rendered infructuous.

¶33

It is accordingly disposed of.

¶34

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶35

Tahir/61-62

Ramhans v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramhans v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mool Chand S/O Shri Mangi Lal Bagdi, Vs Thakurji Shri 1008 Shri Keshavramji, Maharaj Virajman Mandir Kalan Mohalla

Ajit S/O Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Heero @ Heeralal S/O Shri Nijjo Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar Prasad Sharma S/O Late Shri Gulab Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Om Prakash Jatav Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Jagdish Meena @ Jayprakash Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.