This court quashed an FIR and consequential proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC after finding that a compromise was reached between the parties and a divorce decree was obtained.
F.I.R. No.0024/2020 and all consequential proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC against the petitioner are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:28472]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4448/2024
Rahul Sanadhya S/o Sh. Narendra Sanadhya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nai Abadi, Vivekanand Chouraha, Kankroli, Teh. And Dist. Rajsamand.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Abhimanyu Khatri |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P. |
| Ms. Rajni Kaushik for complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
12/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:28472]
[CRLMP-4448/2024]
(2 of 2)
Learned counsel has placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303]. He urges that the impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise.
(ARUN MONGA),J
Whether Fit for Reporting – Yes / No
25-AnilKC/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and consequential proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC should be quashed on the basis of a compromise deed?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied¶19
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Sanadhya
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Sakshi Choudhary
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
