Dismissed

Chetna Nagar D/O Shri Badri Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Dec 2024CRLMP/443/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition seeking protection of life and liberty was dismissed by the Rajasthan High Court. The court ruled the petition had become infructuous due to a lapse of time since its filing in 2021, noting no efforts were made to argue the matter. Pending applications were also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed as infructuous; stay applications and pending applications were also dismissed.

Chetna Nagar D/O Shri Badri Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:50792]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 443/2021

¶4

Chetna Nagar D/o Shri Badri Lal, aged about 28 Years, Resident of 294, Santoshi Nagar, Kota (Raj.) At present residing In Live in relation with Sanjay Kumar Nagar Son of Shri Burdhi Lal Nagar, aged 31 Years, Resident of 34, Near Primary School Dholam, Police Station Chhipa Barod, District Baran (Raj.)

¶5

Sanjay Kumar Nagar son of Shri Birdhi Lal Nagar, aged about 31 Years, Resident of 34, Near Primary School Dholam, Police Station Kawai, District Baran (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, through P.p.

¶9

Superintendent of Police, Baran, District Baran (Raj.)

¶10

S.H.O., Police Station Chhipa Barod, District Baran (Raj.) 4. Badri Lal Son of Shri Heera Lal, Resident of 294, Santoshi Nagar, Kota (Raj.)

¶11

Ravi Son of Shri Heera Lal, Resident of 294, Santoshi Nagar, Kota (Raj.)

¶12

Satyanarayan Son of Shri Hemram, Resident of Jakhdod, Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota (Raj.)

¶13

Bajrang Lal Son of Shri Ram Narayan, Resident of Village Bambori, Police Station Chhipa Barod, District Baran (Raj.)

¶14

Mukesh Son of Shri Ram Narayan, Resident of Village Bambori, Police Station Chhipa Barod, District Baran (Raj.)

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

¶17

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

10/12/2024

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:50792]

[CRLMP-443/2021]

The instant petition has been preferred, seeking directions to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondent Nos. 4 to 8. The said petition was filed in the year 2021, thereafter, no efforts were made to argue the matter, it appears that by efflux of time, the instant petition has become infructuous.

¶24

Dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶25

Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stands dismissed.

¶26

However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for recalling/modification of this order, after service, in case, any cause of action/grievance still survives.

¶27

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶28

GARIMA /55

Chetna Nagar D/O Shri Badri Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetna Nagar D/O Shri Badri Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banwari Lal S/O Shri Nanuram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Akshay Chand Dadhich S/O Shri Ambrishchand Dadhich, Vs State of Rajasthan

Surajbhan Kumawat S/O Shri Jagdish Prasad Kumawat, Vs State of Rajasthan

Heera Lal S/O Kishnaram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Shama Parveen D/O Emamudeen W/O Jitender Rana @ Javed Vs Jitender Rana @ Javed S/O Shri Roshan Rana

Nirbhay Singh S/O Bhagat Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan